Mini 360 DC/DC converter : avoid !

 

For the spot welder replacement board, i wanted to use a DC/DC converter to lower the 12v input voltage to something smaller (5V).

The aim is to avoid heat and lower the current consumption, so that there will be no problem when the spot welding happens.


The original boards consume about 10 mA, the STM32F1 based one consumes about 50 mA.

I happened to have several of those mini 360 DC/DC converters. They are based on MP2307.

The bluepill needs about 50 mA at 5v idling.

The DC/DC is powered by 12V, outputs 5V  and needs ...70 mA!

WTF ?

I tested it with no load at all, still ~70 mA

Changing the self and/or the output cap and/or the load makes the consumption varies a lot, between 7mA to 80 mA+load.

Additionally the output oscillates , +- 0.5v at high frequency.


From what i could see with a quick check, it needs a self/cap/... tuned to the input/output/load settings and if you dont have the right ones it will heat up and have a very bad efficiency.

So unless you know you are in the good spot for those DC/DC converter, better to avoid them.

A 7805 will work as well without the hashing noise.


Edit :  i checked the self : 10 uH, the output cap is 10 uF, they are ~  in line with the datasheet


Edit : The datasheet actually asks for ~ 50 uf output cap and indeed putting a big electrolytic cap in addition to the 10uF ceramic does help a lot

Comments

  1. UnknownSeptember 25, 2021 at 7:46 AM

    Is it the MP2307 version or the M1584 one?
    See here:
    https://groups.google.com/g/sheffield-hardware-hackers/c/wgkXAE_sAvI/m/37VQNSPbAQAJ

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Component tester with STM32 : Part 1 ADC, Resistor

Image
I was always  fascinated by the so call "transistor testers" that identify and report pin out, features of pretty much whatever you throw at it. They are based on Atmel 328p chip, the same as arduino nano. So why not do the same thing with a STM32/Bluepill ? The STM32 is faster, has a better ADC accuracy, more memory, can do float etc... and is not more expensive. Warning : I'm doing this for fun & to learn, it might contain error & plain misunderstanding So, i watched a couple of video on the general principle on how they work. This is not a "port" but a rewrite from ~ scratch. When something is weird, i check what the original one does for comparison. Measuring resistance So first thing first :  Resistance & Capacitance. These 2 will unlock the other ones. So how do we measure resistance ? What we do is a resistor divider with a know resistance value: Measure = Vcc*(RtoTest/(RtoTest+Rknown)) As far as the ADC goes, it means ADC=
Read more

Fixing the INA3221

Image
It 's not too complicated to change the board we have seen  previously . You 'll need to cut some tracks, i did it with a dremel and i'm not very handy, so you'll do better. Red =Cut tracks Blue = Add wire 1- You'll need to separate the bottom connector from the ground, cut the 3 connectors BOTH SIDES. 2- Remove the small red area below the middle resistor to isolate each channels from each other Last, connect right side of each connector to the now isolated pad. Mine looks like this after the operation (ugly i know): Be wary of the small track on the left connector that leads to the left side of channel3 resistor. I cut it while isolating the right pad. Now it works, we can go back to the charger.
Read more

INA3221, weird wiring

Image
Continuing my "smart" battery charger, i've finally received the INA3221 module. It is the purple one you can find on ebay for ~ 5 bucks I soldered a couple of pins to be able to connect it so that i could test it and something immediately caught my attention. It is supposed to be a high side current/voltage sensor, typically in a setup like that : So you can measure the voltage supplied to the load, and the current going through it. Now, let's have a look at the module, look at the top of the following pic, where the sense connectors are. CH3/GND/CH2/GND/CH1/GND ? Wait ? What ? Yes, all the IN- pins are connected to ground, so it is a bottom current only sensor. Additionally, the - side of the shunts are ALSO connected to the ground, no only the connectors. The actual layout is like that : That raises two problems :  The voltage is meaningless as we are only measuring Current x ShuntValue, not the supply volt
Read more