DSO 150 : Calibration ? Nah, not really


Both the official DSO firmwares and my own offer a "calibration".
But actually, it is not a real calibration. It is a zero offset calibration.

If we look at the schematic, we have several amplifying stages.
The last stages is a bit special : It is also a shifting stage.


Not only does it multiply the input by 1+1000/130 = 8.7, but it also shifts the input by +1.6 volt

Why ?

Because until now we were in AC mode, so the voltage could be in AV- / AV+ range (i.e ~ +-5V)
After that last stage, we are in MCU mode, with a voltage between 0 and 3.3 v

So,  the input is shifted by half of it (i.e. 3.3/2=1.6 v) to be able to sample negative AND positive voltages. -Vmax becomes zero, and +Vmax becomes 3.3v.

We lose one bit of accuracy in the process to deal with the "sign".

When you do a "calibration", you short circuit the inputs to get a zeo there and then the firmware reads what is the actual zero in the ADC, for each voltage range.

In theory, in a perfect world, it would be 4096/2=2048 (it is a 12 bits ADC). But it can be slightly off due to errors, components tolerance, temperature, etc...

So what the "calibration" actually does is only "calibrate the zero volt level".

The actual voltage is computed using "perfect" values, very close to the one you are using, but not EXACTLY the same. For example, a 1k resistor could be  actually 1.001k, and those errors accumulate.

So in Git:master , you have a new feature called "Fine Calibrate", where you feed the scope with exact and known values (10V, 5v, 2.5v, 1V) and it computes the real amplification for that voltage range.

That  improves accuracy significantly. 

The accuracy depends on the voltage range. Assuming with have 10 divisions range and a 12 bits ADC, we have the following accuracy

5V / Div => 10mv
2V/ Div =>  5mv
1V/Div  => 2.5 mv

( The error is actually much higher due to noise. )
Result :



7.70 vs 7.71,nice :)
It is not always that good, but is not a multimeter after all.

Update : 
After fixing some bugs, the accuracy is now in the 1% range

Update 2:
Between old analog board and new analog boards,  the last stage gain is not exactly the same (7.7 vs 8.7), so without manual calibration one firmware cannot work the same on both, unless you detect the board type)





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Component tester with STM32 : Part 1 ADC, Resistor

Image
I was always  fascinated by the so call "transistor testers" that identify and report pin out, features of pretty much whatever you throw at it. They are based on Atmel 328p chip, the same as arduino nano. So why not do the same thing with a STM32/Bluepill ? The STM32 is faster, has a better ADC accuracy, more memory, can do float etc... and is not more expensive. Warning : I'm doing this for fun & to learn, it might contain error & plain misunderstanding So, i watched a couple of video on the general principle on how they work. This is not a "port" but a rewrite from ~ scratch. When something is weird, i check what the original one does for comparison. Measuring resistance So first thing first :  Resistance & Capacitance. These 2 will unlock the other ones. So how do we measure resistance ? What we do is a resistor divider with a know resistance value: Measure = Vcc*(RtoTest/(RtoTest+Rknown)) As far as the ADC goes, it means ADC=
Read more

Fixing the INA3221

Image
It 's not too complicated to change the board we have seen  previously . You 'll need to cut some tracks, i did it with a dremel and i'm not very handy, so you'll do better. Red =Cut tracks Blue = Add wire 1- You'll need to separate the bottom connector from the ground, cut the 3 connectors BOTH SIDES. 2- Remove the small red area below the middle resistor to isolate each channels from each other Last, connect right side of each connector to the now isolated pad. Mine looks like this after the operation (ugly i know): Be wary of the small track on the left connector that leads to the left side of channel3 resistor. I cut it while isolating the right pad. Now it works, we can go back to the charger.
Read more

INA3221, weird wiring

Image
Continuing my "smart" battery charger, i've finally received the INA3221 module. It is the purple one you can find on ebay for ~ 5 bucks I soldered a couple of pins to be able to connect it so that i could test it and something immediately caught my attention. It is supposed to be a high side current/voltage sensor, typically in a setup like that : So you can measure the voltage supplied to the load, and the current going through it. Now, let's have a look at the module, look at the top of the following pic, where the sense connectors are. CH3/GND/CH2/GND/CH1/GND ? Wait ? What ? Yes, all the IN- pins are connected to ground, so it is a bottom current only sensor. Additionally, the - side of the shunts are ALSO connected to the ground, no only the connectors. The actual layout is like that : That raises two problems :  The voltage is meaningless as we are only measuring Current x ShuntValue, not the supply volt
Read more