Ethernet Swindle and gcc vs clang

 There will be soon a new flavor of the swindle : The ethernet swindle


It's starting to work nicely, utltimately the goal is to use the CH32V208 that is available for ~ 4$ on aliexpress. It's basically a CH32V307 without HS usb and without fpu,  same flash, same ram (more on that later).


 LWIP is pretty big and i'm running short on both flash & ram.

While looking into it, i discovered a nice option that gcc has and clang does not

"-msave-restore"

Since the Riscv does not have stmia/ldmia style instruction, it must push and pop all registers one at a time when entering/exiting a function. That is consuming a lot of code space for short functions.

The -msave-restore creates function to save/restore , all possible variants and call them instead of manually pushing/popping registers.

Let's give it a try, baseline is clang + hw FPU:

Clang + HW FPU    255 508   (+0kB)

Clang + no FPU       257 632  (+2KB)

Clang + FPU+LTO  232 690  (-22kB)

GCC + no FPU        258 934 (+3kB)

GCC+no FPU+saverestore 244 000 (-14 kB)


LTO is the big winner but it makes the code difficult to debug and is prone to quirky behaviour.

The "-msave-restore" gives a nice 14kB decrease. Too bad it's not available for clang.     


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Component tester with STM32 : Part 1 ADC, Resistor

Image
I was always  fascinated by the so call "transistor testers" that identify and report pin out, features of pretty much whatever you throw at it. They are based on Atmel 328p chip, the same as arduino nano. So why not do the same thing with a STM32/Bluepill ? The STM32 is faster, has a better ADC accuracy, more memory, can do float etc... and is not more expensive. Warning : I'm doing this for fun & to learn, it might contain error & plain misunderstanding So, i watched a couple of video on the general principle on how they work. This is not a "port" but a rewrite from ~ scratch. When something is weird, i check what the original one does for comparison. Measuring resistance So first thing first :  Resistance & Capacitance. These 2 will unlock the other ones. So how do we measure resistance ? What we do is a resistor divider with a know resistance value: Measure = Vcc*(RtoTest/(RtoTest+Rknown)) As far as the ADC goes, it means ADC=...
Read more

Fixing the INA3221

Image
It 's not too complicated to change the board we have seen  previously . You 'll need to cut some tracks, i did it with a dremel and i'm not very handy, so you'll do better. Red =Cut tracks Blue = Add wire 1- You'll need to separate the bottom connector from the ground, cut the 3 connectors BOTH SIDES. 2- Remove the small red area below the middle resistor to isolate each channels from each other Last, connect right side of each connector to the now isolated pad. Mine looks like this after the operation (ugly i know): Be wary of the small track on the left connector that leads to the left side of channel3 resistor. I cut it while isolating the right pad. Now it works, we can go back to the charger.
Read more

INA3221, weird wiring

Image
Continuing my "smart" battery charger, i've finally received the INA3221 module. It is the purple one you can find on ebay for ~ 5 bucks I soldered a couple of pins to be able to connect it so that i could test it and something immediately caught my attention. It is supposed to be a high side current/voltage sensor, typically in a setup like that : So you can measure the voltage supplied to the load, and the current going through it. Now, let's have a look at the module, look at the top of the following pic, where the sense connectors are. CH3/GND/CH2/GND/CH1/GND ? Wait ? What ? Yes, all the IN- pins are connected to ground, so it is a bottom current only sensor. Additionally, the - side of the shunts are ALSO connected to the ground, no only the connectors. The actual layout is like that : That raises two problems :  The voltage is meaningless as we are only measuring Current x ShuntValue, not the supply volt...
Read more